Welcome to the new Rules FAQ, where you get the chance to ask our experts questions on the Rules of Squash, and to browse through already answered questions.
Search the FAQs
Use the form below to search the FAQs
Browse Questions by Category
Latest Rules Questions
The Referee is in charge of the overall match - timing, appeals and discipline. The marker announces and keeps the score and repeats the referee's decisions after an appeal.
In normal play, you need to win by two clear points, eg 12-10, 16-14, and the game continues until someone has that two point gap.
In doubles, it's sudden-death at ten-all, so the next point wins the game.
The warmup is 5 minutes, players usually change sides halfway through.
I’ve been watching a lot of PSA squash recently. One thing that intrigues me, is as I unsersatand it, that a player must make a reasonable attempt to clear the ball so their opponent can have a clear shot. So often I see the striker hold their ground not making any effort to clear the ball (I.e they simply stand their ground) and their opponent calls a let and that’s what they get, irrespective of a video review. Why is this? Often the rationale is the striker had a clean line to the ball. If however, the opponent had made a reasonable attempt to clear the ball the striker would have had a chance to play a much better shot. It seems to me that the rule is you can interfere with your opponent’s shot as long as they could return a shot which puts them at a disadvantage. You only have to listen to the commentators expert opinion and the video review to see how their interpretation of the rule differs. Could you please clarify the rule to me. Thank you.
I obviously cannot comment on the specific decisions or the commentators expressed opinions but there remains the duty of the striker to play a shot that he/she can clear to provide his/her opponent with a path to get to and play the ball. The referees are required to determine whether this was done sufficiently and especially at the PSA professional level players are required to continue play if they have a line to the ball even if it is not perfectly ideal...in the effort to keep play continuous with fewer stoppages for appeals and Lets and more entertaining for television.
Regarding the new rules changes, has the word "entire" been removed from 8.11 and 8.1.4 as it is superfluous with the word any or is there another interpretation?
You are correct. It was removed as being superfluous.
Regarding the new rule 8.9.3 if the striker holds for fear of hitting an opponent and ask for a let then if there's no interference the referees decision will be no let? is this removing a safety let?
The application will remain the same in that the referee will need to determine whether there was a reasonable fear of hitting the opponent. If the opponent was well clear and the striker misjudged his position then it is a No Let as previously but there may well still be instances where "safety Lets" are appropriate if the opponent was possibly in danger of being hit.
When serving, you must have one foot on the floor, within the service box (inside, not touching the line) when you strike the ball.
If this rule is not adhered to the referee is supposed to say "Fault". The player will then ask what was wrong, and the referee will say "Foot Fault", so we suggest you just say "Foot Fault" in the first place to avoid unnecessary delays and confusion.
Foot faults only apply to recreational players - professional players are allowed to have their foot outside the box or in the air.
Well, the latest rules say that you should call "fault", but everyone we know thinks you should call "out" just like any other time the ball goes out.
It's a stroke, but be careful, please !
"Down" is when the ball is correctly struck, but hits the floor or the tin. "Not up" is when the ball is incorrectly struck, eg a double bounce, a double hit or carry.
When the ball goes out of court - on or above the top lines, or on a glassback court on the top of the back wall, the correct call is "out"
My opponent was in front of the "T". He was the outgoing player. I was behind him on the "T". He hit a loose two wall drop shot. The ball hit the right wall first then the front wall. How should the outgoing player move or not move to give me a direct path to the ball? Some people have said it's okay to stay on the "T". From what I've read the outgoing player must exit the "T". My thought is that the outgoing players only action would be to move forward and to the left. This would give me access to the ball and allow him to circle around.
There is no "right to the T", once you've played the ball you have to allow your opponent direct access to the ball. He can move anywhere he wants, but he has to move, otherwise it will be a stroke to you. Of course, it's best not to play shots to the middle that force you to move out, giving your opponent positional advantage.
(ps this page isn't supposed to be live yet, so well done on finding it, and I'm answering 'unnoficially' !
Ask a Question
Use the form below to ask a question